<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ning vs WidgetLaboratory: A lesson in unprofessionalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html</link>
	<description>Patrick Lightbody's personal blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:40:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Ning</title>
		<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html/comment-page-1#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Ning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by arezus on 2008-11-06  Ning vs WidgetLaboratory: A lesson in unprofessionalism  http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 1 members originally found by arezus on 2008-11-06  Ning vs WidgetLaboratory: A lesson in unprofessionalism  <a href="http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html" rel="nofollow">http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html</a> &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fosat</title>
		<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html/comment-page-1#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>fosat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbody.net/blog/2008/08/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-a-lesson-in-unprofessionalism.html#comment-959</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://fosat.tumblr.com/post/47364733/fosat-comment-on-ning-vs-widgetlaboratory&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Ok - I was crazy enough to read all the 458  posts (as of August 26th  on three threads about Ning vs. WL at TechCrunch).
You probably don&#039;t want to do that to get the picture. But the few things that really convinced me where these two posts...	
Very good point &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/24/dont-post-the-evidence-unless-it-supports-your-case/all-comments/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Pandrogas&lt;/a&gt;I had similar thoughts when I read the published &lt;a href=&quot;http://widgetlaboratory.blogspot.com/2008/08/publication-of-correspondence-between.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;e-mail correspondence&lt;/a&gt; between WidgetLaboratory and Ning.
&lt;i&gt;&quot;(WidgetLaboratory) ... destroyed ... (their decent points) writing those emails&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; in the most arrogant way possible.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Terry in the other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/23/widgetlaboratory-strikes-back-at-ning-where-it-hurts/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WL thread&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/a&gt; wrote (and isn&#039;t he right somehow?):
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Without &lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ning.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;NING&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;, they would have never existed. They benefited greatly from NING. Now, given those facts, if it were me, I would have sent &lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fosat.tumblr.com/post/47120921/gina-bianchini-on-the-future-of-social-niche&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Gina&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt; a bouquet of roses every day and sent &lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Marc&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt; a handwritten thank you note every single day.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;
Or - maybe the the story can be told totally different as well.   Like:
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Maybe WidgetLaboratory provoked the split on purpose because they want to build their own business without Ning. They have everything they wanted (deep knowledge of the datapool technology AND access to Ning network content) and now can sue Ning on top of it.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fosat.tumblr.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fosat&lt;/a&gt; - The Future of Sex and Technology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://fosat.tumblr.com/post/47364733/fosat-comment-on-ning-vs-widgetlaboratory" rel="nofollow"></a><br />
Ok &#8211; I was crazy enough to read all the 458  posts (as of August 26th  on three threads about Ning vs. WL at TechCrunch).<br />
You probably don&#8217;t want to do that to get the picture. But the few things that really convinced me where these two posts&#8230;	<br />
Very good point <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/24/dont-post-the-evidence-unless-it-supports-your-case/all-comments/#comments" rel="nofollow">@Pandrogas</a>I had similar thoughts when I read the published <a href="http://widgetlaboratory.blogspot.com/2008/08/publication-of-correspondence-between.html" rel="nofollow">e-mail correspondence</a> between WidgetLaboratory and Ning.<br />
<i>&#8220;(WidgetLaboratory) &#8230; destroyed &#8230; (their decent points) writing those emails</i><i> in the most arrogant way possible.&#8221;</i><br />
Terry in the other <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/23/widgetlaboratory-strikes-back-at-ning-where-it-hurts/" rel="nofollow">WL thread</a> at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">TechCrunch</a> wrote (and isn&#8217;t he right somehow?):<br />
<i>&#8220;Without </i><a href="http://www.ning.com" rel="nofollow"><i><span class="caps">NING</span></i></a><i>, they would have never existed. They benefited greatly from <span class="caps">NING.</span> Now, given those facts, if it were me, I would have sent </i><a href="http://fosat.tumblr.com/post/47120921/gina-bianchini-on-the-future-of-social-niche" rel="nofollow"><i>Gina</i></a><i> a bouquet of roses every day and sent </i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen" rel="nofollow"><i>Marc</i></a><i> a handwritten thank you note every single day.</i>&#8220;<br />
Or &#8211; maybe the the story can be told totally different as well.   Like:<br />
<i>&#8220;Maybe WidgetLaboratory provoked the split on purpose because they want to build their own business without Ning. They have everything they wanted (deep knowledge of the datapool technology <span class="caps">AND </span>access to Ning network content) and now can sue Ning on top of it.&#8221;</i><br />
<a href="http://fosat.tumblr.com" rel="nofollow">fosat</a> &#8211; The Future of Sex and Technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
