<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: File transfers using SOAP (XFire)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/04/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/04/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html</link>
	<description>Patrick Lightbody's personal blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:40:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lightbody</title>
		<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/04/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html/comment-page-1#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lightbody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/4/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html#comment-788</guid>
		<description>I hear what you&#039;re saying. Since I&#039;m using Maven, the number of dependencies isn&#039;t something that affects me too often - though I did run in to a couple jar conflicts along the way. Ultimately, I found that Hessian had some bugs in it and also didn&#039;t make transferring large files in a performant way. And XFire has a much more active release schedule and was much quicker to fix any issues I found.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying. Since I&#8217;m using Maven, the number of dependencies isn&#8217;t something that affects me too often &#8211; though I did run in to a couple jar conflicts along the way. Ultimately, I found that Hessian had some bugs in it and also didn&#8217;t make transferring large files in a performant way. And XFire has a much more active release schedule and was much quicker to fix any issues I found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjanbacchu</title>
		<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/04/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html/comment-page-1#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>anjanbacchu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/4/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html#comment-787</guid>
		<description>hi there,

just wondering what the main reason you did away with hessian.

you&#039;ve mentioned that you wanted an open protocol but was adding a lot of libraries worth it ?

thank you,

BR,
~A
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there,</p>
<p>just wondering what the main reason you did away with hessian.</p>
<p>you&#8217;ve mentioned that you wanted an open protocol but was adding a lot of libraries worth it ?</p>
<p>thank you,</p>
<p><span class="caps">BR,</span><br />
~A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navigator</title>
		<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/04/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html/comment-page-1#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>navigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/4/file_transfers_using_soap_xfir.html#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent tips!  This needs to somehow get into the XFire docs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent tips!  This needs to somehow get into the XFire docs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
