<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teaching Mr. Rails a Lesson on Productivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/03/teaching_mr_rails_a_lesson_on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/03/teaching_mr_rails_a_lesson_on.html</link>
	<description>Patrick Lightbody's personal blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:51:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee Chu</title>
		<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/03/teaching_mr_rails_a_lesson_on.html/comment-page-1#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Chu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/3/teaching_mr_rails_a_lesson_on.html#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Now, although this is a quite well written post, the entire comparison is simply *RIDICULOUS*!

They belong to 2 entirely different classes of &quot;editors&quot;: IntelliJ IDEA is a full-blown IDE (as in *Integrated* Development Environment) whereas TextMate is, as you so rightly said, a &quot;general purpose text editor&quot;.

So, if you want to do comparisons, then review IDEA against *its own peers* (&quot;Wikipedia comparison of IDEs&quot;:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments) and compare TextMate to *its competition* (&quot;Wikipedia comparison of Text Editors&quot;:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, although this is a quite well written post, the entire comparison is simply <strong><span class="caps">RIDICULOUS</span></strong>!</p>
<p>They belong to 2 entirely different classes of &#8220;editors&#8221;: IntelliJ <span class="caps">IDEA </span>is a full-blown <span class="caps">IDE </span>(as in <strong>Integrated</strong> Development Environment) whereas TextMate is, as you so rightly said, a &#8220;general purpose text editor&#8221;.</p>
<p>So, if you want to do comparisons, then review <span class="caps">IDEA </span>against <strong>its own peers</strong> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments">Wikipedia comparison of <span class="caps">IDE</span>s</a>) and compare TextMate to <strong>its competition</strong> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors">Wikipedia comparison of Text Editors</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam SF</title>
		<link>http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/03/teaching_mr_rails_a_lesson_on.html/comment-page-1#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbody.net/blog/2006/3/teaching_mr_rails_a_lesson_on.html#comment-784</guid>
		<description>Excellent article on the features of IDEA.  Even when I am programming in Ruby I use IDEA for all the reasons you outline here.  It makes me feel like a CSS/HTML genius.

The only thing I don&#039;t totally agree with is the lack of command line integration.  Its actually pretty easy to define a command line tool in IDEA, bind it to a key, and use it, i.e. rake etc.  They are pretty flexible too with the ability to use a lot of the context available.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article on the features of <span class="caps">IDEA. </span> Even when I am programming in Ruby I use <span class="caps">IDEA </span>for all the reasons you outline here.  It makes me feel like a <span class="caps">CSS</span>/HTML genius.</p>
<p>The only thing I don&#8217;t totally agree with is the lack of command line integration.  Its actually pretty easy to define a command line tool in <span class="caps">IDEA, </span>bind it to a key, and use it, i.e. rake etc.  They are pretty flexible too with the ability to use a lot of the context available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
